This Opposition was filed at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) on December 10, 2010 and assigned serial number 91197788 by the TTAB.

Defendant:
Sealy Technology, LLC represented by AMY SULLIVAN CAHILL of STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC.

Plaintiff:
Serta, Inc. represented by NICOLE M MURRAY of QUARLES & BRADY LLP.

Prosecution History:
December 10, 2010 – FILED AND FEE
December 10, 2010 – NOTICE AND TRIAL DATES SENT; ANSWER DUE:
December 10, 2010 – PENDING, INSTITUTED
December 14, 2010 – P CHANGE OF CORRESP ADDRESS
January 19, 2011 – ANSWER
January 27, 2011 – D MOT TO SUSP PEND DISP CIV ACTION
February 16, 2011 – P OPP/RESP TO MOTION
March 08, 2011 – D REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
March 14, 2011 – SUSPENDED PENDING DISP OF CIVIL ACTION
March 14, 2012 – RESPONSE DUE 30 DAYS (DUE DATE)
March 27, 2012 – D RESP TO BD ORDER/INQUIRY
April 17, 2012 – SUSPENDED PENDING DISP OF CIVIL ACTION
April 17, 2013 – RESPONSE DUE 30 DAYS (DUE DATE)
May 16, 2013 – D CHANGE OF CORRESP ADDRESS
May 16, 2013 – D RESP TO BD ORDER/INQUIRY
June 04, 2013 – SUSP PEND DISP OF CIVIL ACTION
June 05, 2014 – RESPONSE DUE 30 DAYS (DUE DATE)
June 16, 2014 – D RESP TO BD ORDER/INQUIRY
July 16, 2014 – SUSP PEND DISP OF CIVIL ACTION
July 21, 2015 – RESPONSE DUE 30 DAYS (DUE DATE)
August 19, 2015 – D APPEARANCE / POWER OF ATTORNEY
August 19, 2015 – D RESP TO BD ORDER/INQUIRY
September 21, 2015 – SUSP PEND DISP OF CIVIL ACTION
September 28, 2016 – RESPONSE DUE 30 DAYS (DUE DATE)
View this TTAB Proceeding at USPTO

About Select IP
Select IP Law Corporation monitors TTAB proceedings that have been instituted. We are experts in trademark law. If you are interested in connecting with an IP law attorney or patent law attorney, please contact us via the contact form.